My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
01-25-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2024 1:19:01 PM
Creation date
2/9/2024 1:15:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
December 2C, 1992 <br />SHORELAaND ZONING <br />FLEXIBILITY REQUEST <br />INTRODUCTION <br />State regulations governing shoreland apply statewide. Although several classes of lakes are <br />recognized such as natural environment lakes, recreational development lakes, general <br />development lakes, the geological setting of these lakes thri ughout the State varies <br />considerably as well as the urban and lural environments in which they are located. B^ause <br />of this, the State allows flexibility with respect to certain features in the ordinance provided <br />the intent of the ordinance is met. <br />Some key factors affecting Victoria’s shoreland flexibility request include; <br />1. Numerous areas abutting the classified lakes are already subdivided, however, some <br />of these have been subdivided under the existing shoreland regulations which have <br />some provisions that are stricter than the current standards in the State guide. In <br />other areas, the subdivision occurred prior to the City ’s tirst shoreland ordinance. <br />2. The Lake Minnetonka area is substantially developed and has wooded, steep slopes <br />throughout most of its area. <br />3. Portions of Victoria’s ordinance exceed the State standard, e.g. lot width and lot area <br />for most of the single family developments (see pages 2 and 3). <br />All land in Victoria abutting Lake Minnetonka is zoned Lake Minnetonka Residential <br />District - no commercial or industrial uses are allowed. Park and open space exist or <br />is proposed for most of the shoreline on all the other lakes. <br />4. <br />5.Viitually :ill of downtown Victoria falls within 1,(KX) feet of Stieger Lake. Portions <br />or downtown have nearly 90% impervious surfacing and much of the area was <br />developed and platted 100 years ago. <br />If Statewide standards arc rigorously applied and adopted as provided for in the State’s model <br />ordinance, too miany legally existing uses and lots would become nonconforming creating <br />unnecessary complications. Further development and redevelopment of downtown could <br />become impossible. The flexibility request allows for adjustments based or: these factors and <br />conditions while meeting the State’s general requirements and the land use policies and <br />objectives of the City as expressed in the City ’s comprehensive plan and other documents. <br />tXE X IB IL rr Y »_I3 LMS mEyriHEJB. <br />Based on a review of conditions in Victoria, the comprehensive plan and the Statewide <br />standards, flexibility from the shoreland stand.irds is requested in the following areas: <br />I Lot widtn - but not on Lake Minnetonka <br />Lor area • but not on Lake Mumetonka <br />Building height
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.