My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2024 CC Agenda Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2024
>
02-12-2024 CC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2024 11:24:51 AM
Creation date
2/9/2024 10:49:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. 7448 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by <br />reference. <br /> <br />2. The Property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> <br />3. The Property contains 82,241 square feet in area and has a defined lot width of 175 feet at the 75- <br />foot lakeshore setback and a lot width of 195 feet at the OHWL. <br /> <br />4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 % according to the Stormwater Quality <br />Overlay District. <br /> <br />5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: <br />a. Average Lakeshore Setback <br /> <br />6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance upon the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and <br />air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br />area. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS: <br /> <br />1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent <br />of the ordinance . . . .” The existing home on the lot does not conform with the average lakeshore <br />setback. The average lakeshore setback line currently bisects the home. The proposed project <br />increases the height of the home by about a foot and includes an addition underneath an existing <br />deck and two new deck stairs. The proposed project is modest and does not impact the neighboring <br />views of the lake. The proposed renovation of the existing home is in harmony with the general <br />intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties present. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />2. “Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive <br />plan.” The renovation of an existing single-family home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The applicant has identified the necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their <br />requests. The proposal will meet all of zoning requirements. This criterion is met. <br /> <br />3. “Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. ‘Practical difficulties,’ as used in connection with <br />the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> <br />128
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.