My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
01-11-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2024 3:48:42 PM
Creation date
2/5/2024 3:45:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r • i. <br />Forest Arms Country Club Assoc. <br />Forest Arms Lane <br />October 26. 1992 <br />KtCfc.1 Vci»; <br />Euqene R. 5trommen. Director LMCD <br />900 L Wayzata Blvci. Suite 160 <br />Wayzata, Mn. 55391 <br />N'OV 24 1992 <br />• ^IC.D. <br />Dear Mr. Strommen, <br />Enclosed please find our 1995 dock license appllcat>on. You will note that <br />we nave added a back license pavment. as suqoested by several LMCD board <br />directors. Our objectIve is to return to the 1986 dock plan which shows 10 <br />13ft x32 ft. slips, 2 16ft X 28 ft. slips, and 2 16 ft. x 32 ft. slips. And we <br />will pay a correct W5U fee for e^ch slip and for each year. <br />Our intention In reducing 5 of our 32 ft slips to 24 ft silos, in our islSO <br />letter to Frank 1-hxa. was to fetiuCe Our dock fee durinu a tinie when we did <br />not need 10 “ 50 ft 3iipr- We had no intention of qivmq up our <br />grandfathered rlohts to those slips Several LMCD board directors have <br />commented that they are not comfortable with the LMCD diminishing our <br />dock rights without our awareness, and that tliey would support a back <br />license to 1986. <br />s <br />Slips *1 1 to 14 have been licensed as 10 ft .x 16 ft. slips In the past, we <br />had no problem In the past with the LMCD considering them to be 16 ft. sHP’: <br />and assessing us accordingly, as it saved us some money We never <br />suspected that we would not be allowed to move these slips outboard at <br />their actual size when we needed to. We have enclosed a photo, taken June <br />5, 1992, to prove that slips *’1 1 to 14 are much larger that 10ft x 16 ft. as <br />they completely enclose boats that are much longer than 16 ft. Slip *^1 1 <br />contains a 19 ft Alumacraft outboard, slip •’12 contains a 25 ft cnnscraft <br />1.0 , slip ^13 contains a 25 ft. Starcraft 1.0 , and slip '14 contains a 20 ft. <br />pontoon boat with a outboard We desire to move these slips to a lakeward <br />facing position at a size equal to their useful size in 1986 All slips, of <br />course, would be narrowed to 11 ft. width, so that our dock conforms to all <br />set-back requ'rements <br />We had expected that Uie LMCD would have ref ined It’s requlatl'ons. and <br />added a definition of slip size, m time for oir Mi95 license andicatien aini <br />that we could seek guidance from a more pr ecise LMCD code Lackin'^ <br />additional LMCD direction, and liciderstanding tire LfKD cofKerfi for lit*erai
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.