Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO\LMISSION MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />[ft2) mi A GARY DESANTIS/SAILORS WORLD - CONT, <br />Lindquist asked to have the 75’ setback area defined and noted his objection to hardcover in the <br />0-75’ setback area. <br />Peterson also expressed concern over adding more structure to this already developed property <br />He suggested looking at parking spaces 35. 36. 37 and 38 if the structures were to be placed on <br />the property. He felt the DNR was implying that the structure may be '’.cceptable if placed over <br />existing hardcover. <br />Nolan stated that these structures tend to "look bad" after a period of time even though they are <br />galvanized. He asked if DeSantis would consider any other type of struemre. DeSantis said <br />thev would but explained that one of the strong poin:s of these strucnires was the longevity of <br />weathering. He felt that mamtainmg the building would not be a problem since it would be <br />similar to some boat maintenance. <br />Berg asked if the structures would be leased. DeSantis confirmed that they could be with an <br />option to buy He stated dock boxes do not provide sufficient volume for storage. <br />Schroeder stated he would be inclined to find some tspe of storage for the personal lawn mower, <br />etc. close to the existing building He would be opposed to any type of "mini-storage ” as there <br />are off-site options for this. <br />Smith suggested DeSantis consider enlarging the existing outside sued (which has the same <br />outside siding) and using some inside cabinetry for life preservers, etc Although this may not <br />be ideal to the applicant, it may be a workable compromise <br />DeSantis stated it would depend on what could be a tached. There is a need to store pumps. <br />Currently the shed houses only electrical equipment He questioned if he would gam enough <br />storage by enlarging the shed but thought it would worth a try <br />It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Lindquist, to deny Application #1874 for the requested <br />hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for two storage strucnires The proposed location <br />IS unacceptable and there coes not seem to be enough ot a hardship <br />DeSantis asked it tlie structures were moved to the perking spaces out ot the 0-75 setback area <br />and only one structure used, would the objection be removed <br />Schroeder noted the 0 '5’ setback issuea would be acdressed but the nature of the building and <br />hardcover are still issues