Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File 0^2 <br />November 12. 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Special design considerations have been employed to minimize horizontal expansion and <br />limit hardcover. The architect’s addendum. Fxhibit B. notes space has been utilized below and <br />above the grade level garage as living space. A lower level patio lies under a p»)rtion ot the <br />main level ereatroom. review F.xhibit K. The roof deck eliminates need for additional decks and <br />patio. <br />The most unique solution to the excess hardcover is the proposal to install a draintield <br />to treat runoff collected from the flat roof. 7.3% of hardcover from the walk and drive would <br />be treated by surrounding ground area. 25% of the runoff from the hardcover would be <br />disbursed and absorbed in the draintield. <br />Tne applicant also notes if City would consider vacating 5 ’ on either side ot the bO’ right- <br />of-way of Forest l..ike Landing that tfic area within the 75-250 ’ zone would be increased by 740 <br />s.f. also reducing intensity of hardcover excesses. <br />The property has never been assessed for sewer. Review Exhibit L. the sewer is <br />n.’proximaiely 120’ away from property boundary. It will be the applicant’s responsibility to <br />f*fend .sewer to the property. Sewer connection charge will consjst o^t^th^ollowing charges: <br />Plant charge <br />Unit fee for 1970 LS-1 project <br />I.ift Station 10 by-pass charge <br />Lront footage charge S25.30 per front foot <br />225.00 <br />$ 4.111.00 <br />$ 2.188.00 <br />S 4.807.00 (190’ X S25 30) <br />Total fee <br />Service Availability Charge <br />($800 00 as of 1/1/94) <br />$11,331.00 <br />$750 00 <br />The fee schedule provides no diiection for properties where the s^'^'Cr lirw docs not abut <br />the boundaries of the property but where the owner must assume responsibility for extending^ <br />sewer The question is whether it is fair to charge app'icant the lront footage charge at this <br />imc Applit.u.i iiuy «ish to appeal .o the Council at the lime of the Council's review to <br />detcniiine it the $4,807 Ot) fee could he removed from toul sewer uml charge <br />Stah'iiieiii of Hardship <br />Please review Exhibit B. applicant’s addendum Hardships are reviewed as follows: <br />I Total lot area <br />ZODC. <br />is 55.500 5 f. but only 13.700 s f. lies within the 75-250 ’ sctb»:k <br />X Unique topography