Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 <br />(#4) #1860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. <br />Hurr agreed with Kelley that further documentation would be needed to prove continued duplex <br />use before she could make a decision. <br />Mayor Callahan noted that since most of the receipts exist, it is assumed the missing receipts <br />also exist. He felt it questionable that there was a willful abandonment. <br />Jabbour asked tlie City Attorney what liability the City has in issuing the building permit in <br />1978. Staunton thought it would be difficult to make the owners rebuild the house as it was in <br />1978. <br />Mayor Callahan asked if the building currently meets the fire codes for a duplex. Mabuslh <br />responded that there is no housing code in Orono for rental properties. The Building Inspector <br />did make an inspection of the property and there are some recommendations tor corrections of <br />recent improvements. <br />Jabbour felt it obvious the property has been used as a duplex and it would be the City’s job to <br />prove the owners willingly abandoned the duplex use. He added that he sees the City’s only <br />choice to grant the conditional use permit based on the recent discussions. He also did not think <br />parking should impact the neighbrtrs and would be agreeable to three parking spaces. <br />Hurr asked about a previous memo that brought up concerns about the regulation of storage of <br />boats, etc. on the property and if there could be conditions to regulate this in the conditional use <br />permit. Staunton explaiwed that regulations on the storage of boats, etc. would be pursuant to <br />the code regardless of whether there is a conditional use permit granted. He stated that this <br />propertv cannot be treated any differently than any other in the same zoning district because of <br />the conditional use permit. <br />Hurr felt that additional conditions could be put on a property if it has a conditional use permit. <br />Jabbour suggested that if a parking variance were granted, additional conditions could be added <br />to the variance regarding boat storage, etc. This would help to control the water runoff and <br />hardcover in the area. <br />A motion was made by Jaf>bour, seconded by Goetten. to grant a conditional use pemiit for <br />duplex use and a variance to the requirement for four parking stalls because of the City’s <br />intention to reduce water mnoff in this part of the City. A condition of the va'iance resolution <br />will be that no additional exterior parking, i.e. RVs. boats, campers, tractors, trailers. <br />snowim>biles. etc., will be allowed on the property. Ayes 4, nays 1 Hurr oppt>sed the motion. <br />Hurr asked that the resolution include the payment of SAC and sewer as.sessment.