Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File ^1891 <br />November 5. 1993 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />3. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage. <br />Total lot area = 28,100 s.f. <br />Allowed = 4,215 s.f. or 15% <br />Proposed = 2,436.5 s.f. or 8.6% <br />No variance required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />\) <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />H <br />1 <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />Survey <br />Hardcover Fact Sheets <br />Staff Site Plan <br />Survey for Development Plan for North Lot (110 Leaf Street) <br />Elevations <br />Floor Plan <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant proposes a 24’ x 30’ addition to the south sido of the existing residence <br />consisting of two-stall garage, bathroom, laundry room and new side entry to the first floor. <br />The elevations also show a lower level side loading garage (review Exhibit H). As applicants ’ <br />survey/site plan shows, the addition will be placed over existing driveway/parking area. A small <br />triangular portion of the addition will encroach the 75’ protected setback area. Review Exhibit <br />G. in an earlier variance review, the Ordinary High Water Mark of the tributary was <br />detennined at the 979 elevation. Ponding is controlled by the dam to the south of the property <br />The improvement will result in 7.5 s.f. of additional hardcover vithin the 0-75’ setback area. <br />The residence was constructed in April of 1959 under a zoning ordinance that would have <br />required 25,000 s.f. in area and 120’ of lot width. The lot met the necessary standards in 1959. <br />Note the property is platted to the centerline of Ixaf Street. It is the normal practice of <br />the City to define the front street setback line from the defined right-of-way at 33’ The <br />neighbor to the nc>rth in an earlier agreement at the time of the sewering of the area, agreed to <br />deeding the City 25’ for the right-of-way with a 10’ drainage and utility easement. Refer to <br />E.xhibit G. If applicant wishes to deed the City 25’ of tight -of-way The City would be able <br />to consider the setback from the 25’ dedicated right-o^-way. If not. tte City to be consistent <br />must consider the right-of-way shown at 33’ Hardcover facts wou’ l have to he adjusted by <br />reducing area i)t 75-250’ setback area.