10-17-1977 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORi: LAPAYETTE OCIATIO'J lied) JW*: ............................................................................MEOTiS or A PLA>WING COMMISSION tOT.TINC !1ELD OCTOBER 17, 1977 After a lengtliy discussion, Hassel noved, Gutliric seconded, that tliis application be tabled until. (1) Ml prooerty oivners within 150 ft. of tlie subject properties have been notified of . (2) Tliat the applicant verify and establish that this proposed spoils location is not wetlands. (3) Applicant obtain penrits to deteimne that this is mintenance dredging azid not ’^'ow (4) Area for disposal is more tlian 1,000 ft. from the shoreline and there would be no leeching back into the lake. . rs) Applicant submit credible reports indicating advan tages of disposing of spoils on wetlands ^d marshes. (6) Applicant also consider alternatives for disposal of the spoils. Motion - Ayes (7), Nays (0). Mr. lladciJig, Mr. Cargill and Hr. Sjostrom were present. Tlie Zoning Administrator distributed a copy of the preliminary draft of a resolution received from Bruce >!alkerson earlier today. A copy has been mailed to Ron I la mack of the DNR. The Zoning Administrator stated that he liad talked with the IM^R and tliey indicated several suggestions, llieso 'Suggestions v/ere presented to the Council and taey recommended adopting a resolution stating tliat Orono would prefer a dock or access to the lake proper rather than any dredging or dockage in the channel, ^condly would be dockage at tlie mouth of the channel with a dock coming from the nearest point. Mr. Hacking informed the Comission tliat tncy had not received any notice of Council’s consideration of this matter ivhicli resulted in a resolution of direction to tlie Planning Commission. He said they were flying blind as thev just received a copy of tlie resolution tonigat and haven't had a chance to go over it thoroughly. Tney liad the conception that the dock v;ould lie going directly out to the lake with no dredging and liaving a ’T” on the channel. He was concerned about the 30" v/ide doc . mentioned in the resolution, llie ”ayor infomed him that this referred to only the part that was in the channel; t!ie rest would be the full 6 ft. width. Tlie .tiyor also stated that tlie resolution was just a rough draft for direction. Mr. Sjostrom, six'alcing in belialf of the neighboring property owners, stated tliat they are willing to go along with the proposal of having the dock at tlie moutii of the channel ratlier than up in tlie channel. He suggested that tlie Council resolution include wording to the effect tliat tliey arc not recognizing navigability or lef’alitv of the diannel and are not making any future commitments as to any dredging including maintenance dredging. MINUTES OF A PLA^JX- PAGl- 5 I'.TST SHORE LAFAYETTE BAY ASSOCIATION (continued) (1^319) VICTORIA GRAIN CO'IPANY 500 NORTH ARM DRIAT DOCK PROPOSAL (1^200) j ' .A r M V i of all parties inv dock at tlie moutli « shortest point on ■ Guthrie moved. Has: Council's resoluti< of tlie conceptual ] the applicants get alternatives to coi only to Council, bi mooring dock locate of the diannel and extensions from the that plan. In no v navigability of tlie Agreement to indue of the channel as s by all other prtie agencies. Tliis mal. other dredging. Cc the winter to miniir Motion - Ayes (7), The Zoning Adminisi the applicant to si the Planning Commis Hr. Earl Williams, Jolinson were presen neighbor to tlie wes suggested that the equal setback as tli Ecklund). Tlie com been cut in order t The Commission disc of the pedestrian a Such as: (1) conti the neighbor (Ecklui by removing existin, new' 8 ft. ccMmnon st; ing retaining w'all ; further back on tlie lot. This would rc( the top of the reta: Ilr.rr moved, Hamnere! variance and site m code compliance and easement on 4 ft. w; municipal parking Ic on tlic entire stair' sible for snow renoi ’lotion - Ayes (7),