Laserfiche WebLink
ION <br />LOT BLK. <br />— <br />—— <br />----------------—------------ <br />-— <br />----------------- <br />— <br />...-------------— <br />—-—— -— <br />---------- -- ------- — <br />—-------------- <br />—----------------------------------—■' <br />------------——-------------- <br />---------------------— <br />-------------------■ ---------------------------------------------- <br />. —-------- - <br />1 <br />—------------ <br />...------------- . <br />—---------- - <br />. - — - ^— —--------- <br />•.......—- ---------------- . <br />- -.......-.......-------------------- <br />PARCEL <br />f <br />I <br />Planning Conmission 5 Council <br />Hank IMiich, Zoning Acbiinistrator <br />October 13, 1977 <br />ILo./ <br />77 Q <br />6'1) (f <br />Earl Dom - 4045 WatertoisTi Road <br />Variance - Front Setback - Area and Side Setback Undetermined <br />Mr. Dom is requesting a building permit to construct a detached 24' x 24* garage <br />on liis residential property, I informed him that a sun^ey \<ns required before we <br />could detennine whetlier his projxDsal would comply with the current zoning require <br />ments. He felt this v.asn’t necessary. He has substituted the enclosed i)ro[«rty <br />sketch. Tlie dimensions as noted, I believe, are estimates so we cannot deternine <br />actual Vciri.'inces that might be necessary. <br />The zoning requirenents in tliis district are: Area - 5 acres, width - iOO ft. <br />front setback - 100 ft., side setback - 50 ft. <br />From the sketch submitted, there is no way to confirm dimensions as they are not <br />certified. Tlierefore, I cannot determine the extent of variances necessary. <br />If the property consists of 5 acres, an area variance would not be required. From <br />his sketch, it appears the lot is 50 ft. short of required width. Tlie proposed <br />location of the garage would require a 25 ft. variance from the necessary 100 ft. <br />setback. <br />I explained to Mr. Dom tliat \<e could process the variance request based on the <br />enclosed sketch. However, a sur\’ey would be required for issuing a building <br />permit as staff would be unable to confirm location without at least a partial <br />certified survey of the front portion of his property. <br />T^vo other property owners located slightly east of the Dom property are also <br />up for variance consideration at this same meeting. Both Ivive submitted surveys <br />as I requested. Ke could process this application in the same irrmner as Mr. <br />Hankinson on Caman Road arxl include tlie condition of applicant's submitting <br />survey to confirm location. <br />■ <br />% <br />LOCATiaN OF <br />Address Vc <br />Legal Descr <br />APPLICANT <br />Name <br />Address '/c <br />a\'NER <br />N? <br />Address <br />Present Zon <br />Zoning Ordi <br />Specify Ord <br />S//P/-- <br />Explain Req <br />l-f^CNT .5At <br />T c ^ y; <br />Extent of N <br />Hardships t <br />Ai ^ A T ! c /V <br />aahd r>Pi <br />p>r <br />> / 7 <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Applies <br />Plat Mr <br />Suivey <br />Date /C