My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1977 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1977
>
10-17-1977 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2024 10:43:29 AM
Creation date
1/25/2024 10:01:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i-i -2 <br />IL I <br />r.. <br />Planning Coiiimission § Council <br />Hank Muhich, Zoning Administrator 7^- <br />October 13, 1977 <br />Conley Brooks (Peter Fox) - 1125 SprLig Hill Road <br />Subdivision <br />Mr. Brooks is submitting another proposal to si^Jivide one of Jie ^ <br />into tivo parcels (A-1 and A-2). This is a resubdivision of the original subdivision <br />of the entire tract \diich was approved by Council on August 17, 1977. I ra <br />enclosing a copy of the resolution of approval (not certified) of the previous <br />division wh5ch Kas done without the requirements of a final plat (mylar and <br />hardshells). The previous subdivision should be recorded with che County. <br />can deterJnine idietlier a final plat will be required for this <br />Council determines a final plat will lie necessary, tlie standard two step procedure <br />must be folla.'ed (preliminaiy plat approval and final plat approval). <br />Since a final plat was not required with the previous proposal, there is no <br />evidence of casements, one of the conditions listed in the resolution adopted by <br />Council on August 22, 1977. The previous approval was also given subject to a <br />$500 park dedication fee. 'Hiis proposal would require only one more §250 parK <br />dedication fee with tlie addition of only one nore building site. <br />I would like to call to your attention the location of the property line as <br />proposed on this lot split. It appears to be dividing some of the existing access <br />road. The City engineer and attorney might give us some direction on this issue <br />to eliminate any possible future problems with easements and access. <br />We should also consider the description of tiie low land for conservation easements. <br />hhile investigating the site, I saw a structure on the proposed Lot A-1. The <br />location of tliis structure is not indicated on the plat. <br />I have forwarded copies or this proposal along with requests for comments to Jie <br />City Administrator, City Fngineer, City Attorney, City Public horks Director, <br />County Public Works Department and Watershed District. <br />A public hearing has been scheduled for November 7, 1977 at 8:15 p.m. <br />Mti- . <br />U <br />-i > <br />W <br />u ^cr..^ • <br />'ir <br />Street Location of I <br />I>egal Description of <br />eXfner: 0^ N) t-s b V <br />(Nairiej <br />Type of Rc({uest: <br />Description of Reque <br />Please uraw or attac <br />3. <br />Indicate North <br />Location on Lo <br />Adjacent Stree <br />Location of se <br />existing bui <br />Distances betw <br />and structur <br />Map or plat showing <br />or the property affe <br />Abstractors or attor <br />he land within 500 f <br />as those names apj^a <br />Petition showing SOI <br />j 9 ; ^ <br />Village iecommendati<
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.