My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-05-1977 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1977
>
12-05-1977 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2024 1:43:20 PM
Creation date
1/24/2024 1:41:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
977 - PAGE 2 <br />] HARTWELL <br />itinued) <br />\ ' <br />y: . -.7 <br />i1- <br />'.‘vsu 'I <br />iff-- <br />s <br />» •••«»«.»* ' , . <br />minutes of a planning commission meeting held DECEMBER 5, I977 - PAGE 3 <br />The Zoning Administrator stated he had expected <br />City Engineer before the meeting <br />which would have clarified his recommendation <br />of the project. <br />JOHN HARTWELL <br />(continued) <br />#317 <br />^e Commission expressed concern that the proposed <br />lots would be acceptable for a satisfactory septic <br />system. The Commission discussed with the audience <br />the proposed lots and the septic systems and any <br />possible problems that could occur. <br />Mayor Van Nest explained that with a two acre lot <br />it is not necessary to have the entire lot acceptable <br />for a septic system. He added that they wanted <br />to make sure now the lots were buildable and suggested <br />the City Engineer require additional information <br />on the lots where there was a question. <br />Kathleen Kensey, 14111 Albermarle, St. Paul, and <br />Charles Dallar, 1810 Lakeview Avenue, expressed <br />concern about the electric fence along the east <br />and south sides of Outlot 2, Long Lake Country <br />Club Addition. They felt the property owners <br />whose lots would abut the fence might object to <br />the fence and horses so close to their back yard. <br />The Zoning Administrator replied he felt this was <br />a legal situation which the property owners could <br />resolve. Mr. Adams stated he was sure they could <br />work arovind the electric fence and come to a <br />satisfactory agreement. <br />wf^ciosL^at <br />In reply to a question by Commissioner Hammerel <br />the Zoning Administrator stated the City does not <br />know now if the existing septic systems are <br />working and that the City does not have the staff <br />to check these systems annually. He added that <br />the City does not want any new systems without <br />rs new_ng if the existing systems are working properly. ° <br />the .ehdIvt.lo„/beA™r.!th o'SS LJeSy' <br />information, the Commission is told the City Engineer <br />approves the plans. He felt there could be ^ <br />problems if the Commission rushes through the <br />from°thP subdivision without a written reportfrom the City Engineer, <br />:-v : 'A <br />4 <br />■ MIllUTES OF A <br />Mr. Adams ref <br />with the part <br />and the City <br />discussion ai <br />his recommenc <br />asked the Cil <br />of his recorar <br />suggestion ti <br />it was felt 1 <br />The Commissi< <br />Engineer had <br />first letter <br />the subdivis <br />many letters <br />but this is <br />changed, Th' <br />faith on his <br />serious prob <br />and later it <br />buildable. <br />The Planning <br />stated he ha <br />the altemat <br />felt precede <br />one acre lot <br />They felt t <br />require that <br />area require <br />with that de <br />great deal o <br />felt some th <br />City Enginee <br />Commissioner <br />seconded, a <br />preliminary <br />from the Cii <br />lots indicat <br />on-site disp <br />Motion - Ay€ <br />Nays (3); Hs <br />After furthe <br />Commission 1 <br />proposal. <br />Commissionei <br />seconded, a <br />petition foi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.