Laserfiche WebLink
Cr <br />V <br />e.c c: <br />\ t <br />r. <br />^ A-. <br />A:>--/ v>- <br />-» 3^1 <br />:^v:=..; <br />Jf.^'- -- V <br />h <br />4- <br />i;;:.:s <br />r » <br />V !t <br />V:5'. <br />.-•-» *' <br />)> <br />\<6 V <br />\ <br />-'.f <br />'V <br />X <br />\ <br />-!f^. <br />;k- <br />TO:Planning Conmission and Council <br />FRCM:A. P. Olson, Asst. Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:August 11, 1977 <br />SUBJECT:Jerome Carlson - 170 Smith Avenue <br />Conditional Use and Variance <br />Wetlands Variance and Setback Variance <br />The applicant is requesting permission to build a "sports court" for tennis, <br />basketball, etc. Work has already begun and a Stop Order has been posted <br />because the work appears to be in a designated wetlands and because it extends <br />over the property line. We have been told that there is or was intention to <br />enclose the court at a later date. <br />Staff received a call on July 20 asking \vhat was necessary to build the slab. <br />^Vhen we learned of the proposed enclosure we advised of the need for a survey <br />and for a variance for the enclosure because the slab exceeds the maximum <br />allowable accessory building size. No further contact was made by the appli­ <br />cant until August 9, 1977, when a variance application was received including <br />a survey (Exhibit A). Inspection by ^fr. Muhich and Tom Jacobs on August 10, <br />1977, showed that forms and gravel base were already installed in a location <br />other than that indicated on the survey. There were no lot corner stakes <br />visible and the construction had apparently encroached on the designated wet­ <br />lands. A stop order was posted. <br />On August 11, 1977, the applicant submitted a revised survey (Exhibit B) dated <br />July 28, 1977 showing the "athletic court under construction" across the east <br />property line. The applicant advised Mr. Muhich that the court location was a <br />mistake discovered Avhen the survey was made and that the current intention is <br />to relocate the court as shown on Exhibit A. <br />The zoning code specifies a residential accessory building to be a maximum <br />1,000 sq. ft. This court is 1,800 sq. ft. and would become a building if <br />enclosed. The code specifies accessory use setbacks of 50 ft. from the road <br />and 26 ft. from any wetlands. <br />1-96 <br />• 'J\ <br />fi <br />i