My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 3:59:41 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 3:57:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />Jabbour expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission for their professional <br />handling of the zoning applications. <br />Jabbour also reported that payment for the new facilities is almost complete and project <br />costs have come within $1,000 of the budget. One cold storage building was eliminated <br />to stay within the budget. <br />Goetten expressed her concern icr the sun problem in the administrative office and <br />inquired about the status of the order for shades. Moorse explained that the original <br />order was lost by the vendor during a move to a new office location. The blinds were <br />reordered appro.ximately six w'eeks ago and should be in fairly soon. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />(#10) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES - RESOLUTION NO. 3363 <br />Huit asked about the access over Highview Road and if it was a fully improved road access. <br />Mabusth explained access was via a small alleyway that is undeveloped. She added it wall not <br />be an easy property to develop but is very beautiful. <br />A motion was made by Hurr. seconded by Goetten, to appro^'e the sale of the tax forfeit <br />property and retention by the City of the other piece. <br />Kelley asked if the City liad "first rights" to the property if they wanted to buy it. Jabbour <br />noted the City would have to have a purpose for it The County contacts the City in case the <br />City would condemn it for road development, sever, etc. Gerhardson confirmed the property <br />could be retained for park purposes. Kelley tnought the City should consider keeping <br />property rather than "giving it away". Gerhardson stated a buildable property such as thb is <br />usually sold. Mabusth explained that there were 10 potential buildable lots on this larger piece <br />of property. Kelley asked again why the City did not attempt to purchase this piece if they can <br />get It for the market value of $41,500. Councilmembers agreed that further information should <br />be obtained about the pt)ssibility of acquiring this land. <br />Hurr wiilidrew her previous motion <br />Kelley made a motion, Goetten seconded, to table consideration of the tax forfeited land. P.I.D <br />07-117-23 23 0001. until further review can be done. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.