My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 3:59:41 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 3:57:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. ^ ^ <br />3. <br />W <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19. 1993 and <br />recommended approval of the proposed variances as amended based upon the <br />following findings: <br />A. The 4.9 acre parcel has approximately one acre of contiguous dry <br />buildable area . <br />B <br />E. <br />Shoreland Regulations now require 100’ setback for all structures from the <br />Recreational Development lake that encroaches the propeny placing severe <br />restrictions on the building envelope and making existing sirucnires non- <br />conforming. <br />The existing septic system has been found to meet the 3 ’ separation <br />required by new Shoreland Regulations and septic code. <br />The majority of the dry buildable area, approximately two-thirds of the <br />dry buildable envelope is located within the 0-75’ setback area where no <br />hardcover or structural improvements are allowed. <br />Structural setbacks for the newly classified shoreland property make it <br />unbuildable for new development. <br />F. Proposed structural improvements are at 2,562.6 s.f. or 6.2%, well under <br />the allowed 15% strucniral coverage. <br />G. Total hardcover based on the dry buildable portion of the 4.9 acre parcel <br />is proposed at 5,^98.8 s.f. or 14.5%. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not zpply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variaiices would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty ; is necessary to preserve a nibstanfial property <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.