My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-22-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 3:59:41 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 3:57:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
November 5, 1993 <br />Jeanne Mabusth <br />City of Orono <br />PO Box 66 <br />Orono, MN 55323 <br />RE: Variance Approval #1842 <br />Dear Ms. Mabusth: <br />Thank you for your time on November 3, 1993 regarding the minor changes on our variance <br />approval. Per the City’s request, the following changes and reasons tor them are addressed. <br />Enclosing of Existing 2nd Story Peck <br />We started this project with a plan, but as we have learned in remodeling, even the well thought- <br />out plans may change. A wall that we were expecting to remove was found to be a load bearing <br />wall. Removing this wall would have turned into a major construction project and considerable <br />expense. <br />With the wall remaining in place and the 4 1/2 / 12 pitch of the roof, this greatly reduced the <br />amount of actual living space we were hoping to gain. The pitch causes a reduction in head <br />room 2’-3’ from each outside wall. <br />As we of>ened everything up we decided that in order to eliminate this h; dj.hip we could raise <br />the ceiling height by changing the pitch of the roof to a 9 / 12. In turn a 30" to cantilever <br />was needed to gain the living space we were kxrking for. <br />This cantilever extends to the south, which meets the DNR requirement of no turther extension <br />to the east or toward the 929.4 water table line. We have also discussed this with our neighbor <br />to the south, and she has no problems with the extension. <br />Other issues: We were told by the window company, Pella, that our existing windows to <br />remain in the room would not be classified as egress if installed today. Also building codes <br />require windows to be at least 18" off the tloor or they must be tempered. The existing <br />w indow s are 6"-8" off the tloor and we considered this change safer, as it is a child’s bedroom. <br />'Hiree Season Porch
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.