Laserfiche WebLink
r. 'b>\ <br />ni..to: mayor CALLAHAN and OROMO COUMCILMEMBERS <br />from: HARVEY REDER (19 year neighbor to Zelma McLinney ) <br />SUBJECT: H1&60, ZELMA McKIMNEY,359P Livingston ave-Conditiona1 Use Permit. <br />List of Items to te!l council <br />1.Apologize for not speaking at Sept.23 Planning Comw^^jj^i cyi <br />2.Describe 19 years of living directly across the streeMf I f rTSr^zlviQ. <br />3. My concerns and request/suggestions. <br />4. Means of Enforcement of Conditional Use Permit. <br />I tern 1 <br />1 did not realize the importance of this Conditional Use Permit and <br />that the Permit is for the future owner of that property more than it <br />is for Zelmas continued use. I was caught "sleeping". I apologize. <br />Item 2. <br />I have been living directly across the street from Zelma McKinney since <br />late Oct-1974. I have no complaints about the way Zelma has operated her <br />property these last 19 years. Zelma has, for most of the time, been livin-q <br />alone on the main floor with a couple of renters on the top floor. I would <br />describe the "Type and Level of Use" as "Quiet-Lew Key-Conservative".For <br />many years now,I don’t belive Zelma has owned/operated more than one <br />vehicle at this address.The renters normally have had two vehic1es.Zelma <br />does’nt drive now so only the two renters generate most of the traffic. <br />Nothing much was ever stored outside like R.V. or Boats. Zelmas yard was <br />always neat and clean. It was operated much like a single family home. <br />Zelma McKinney has been a good neighbor and I regret she is moving. <br />Item 3. <br />My concern is that more parking spaces would e^epand the level of use <br />just as adding more bedrooms would. The traffic/park 1ng as proposed <br />in Exhibit M,I feel, is not a good usable plan and would lead to m,"'.ny <br />cars parking in the street.The two cars inside the garage can always be <br />blocked by cars outside the garage doors.Uhat would the inside car do if <br />urgently needed? Also,a six inch snow storm,on that uphill grade, would <br />force cars to park on the street. Its a poor plan for a "duplex"in Winter. <br />A new larger garage would help. <br />The size of the lots is about 8334 sq.feet under curent LR-IC , single, <br />family zoning.I feel the property is too small for too many vehicles. <br />Also, where would one park "RV’S and boats...Off site location,! hope. <br />My suggestions are: <br />Non dally used vehicles 8< boats etc. be stored in off site locations. <br />The current driveway/garage be limited to three daily used vehicles.Let <br />the new owner request his/her own larger garage/parking plan if and <br />when they need it. The new owner might not need more than three vehicles. <br />Item 4. <br />I am conserneo aoout the current method of enforcement of this permit. <br />For example. Ordinance No. 172 page 271, requires 75 Percent of all <br />owners within 1000 feet are needed to have this reviewed by Orono <br />City Council. Also of consern is the effort to eliminate the Homestead <br />credit whlci. Orono uses to prove "owner occupied". The new owner will <br />laugh at the City or neighbors if the permit is hard to enforce. <br />In closing: <br />I have no problem with a couple adult renters on the top floor. <br />The real restrictions to Zelmas property are a result of the "City- <br />changes in 1962, 1967/68, and again in 1975.The smaller lot and <br />only one driveway,one garage,don’t help the "traffic-flow" situation. <br />This,only on paper plan,is a future problem.More vehicles and/or parking <br />do not benefit the neighborhood.! ask Council to approve the plan <br />with only three daily used vehicles parking spaces,as it has been used. <br />Thank You. <br />Harvey Reder - -- /-.1 P3596 Livingston Ave.