My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 1:06:18 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 1:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION DENYING AFTER-THE-FACT <br />VARIANCES TO MUTSICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 3 AND <br />SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (I) <br />FILE #1884 <br />WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing <br />under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City <br />Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for tlie protection of the public <br />health, safety and general welfare; and <br />WTIEREAS, Orville Fisher (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the <br />property located at 475 Oxford Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and <br />legally described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Block 1, Stielows Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the <br />property"); and <br />WHEREAS, applicant has applied to the City of Orono for after-the-fact <br />variances for approval of tree removal and intensive vegetation clearing within 75' of the <br />shoreline of Lake Miimetonka w here no tree removal or intensive vegetation clearing is normally <br />allowed per Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 3 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 <br />(I); and <br />WHEREAS, the Orono Planning Commission after due public notice held a <br />public hearing on October 18, 1993 to review the application, at which time the applicant, his <br />agents, and all other interested members of the public were allowed to comment on the propt)sed <br />variances; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on October 18. 1993 recommended on a <br />vote of 6 ayes. 0 nays, that the after-the-fact variances be denied and that the applicant restore <br />the site per a revegetation plan to be approved by the City Council, and <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.