My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-08-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 1:06:18 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 1:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 18, 1993, <br />and recommended approval of the proposed variance, based upon the following <br />findings: <br />A. At just over 16,000 s.f. in area, the combined lots contains substantial <br />area for construction of single family residence without the requirement <br />for any other variances to the zoning chapter. <br />B. Municipal sewer is available and assessed to the property. <br />C. Developed lot sizes in the neighborhood range from 0.14 acre to 1.5 acres <br />of dry land, averaging about 0.5.5 acres. The combination of I^ts 8 and <br />9 at 0.37 acre yields a lot size that is not inconsistent with other lots in the <br />neighborhood. <br />D. Their is no other land available for purchase Ln order to make the lot size <br />conforming. <br />The City Council has considered this application including tlie findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safet) and <br />welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property arc peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to othe; property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is r^essary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is neccssaiy to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent ot the <br />Zoning Code amd Comprehensive Plan of tte City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.