My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
11-08-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 1:06:18 PM
Creation date
1/23/2024 1:01:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 17, 1992 <br />(i»4) #1750 CHARLES & SHIRLEY PYLE, <br />3548 IVY PLACE - <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:20 - 7:36 F.” <br />The Affidavit of Pub Iicat ion and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Pyle and Daryl Hanson were present for this <br />appIicat I on. <br />Mabusth explained that the applicants were asked to <br />ctr.irture at the last Planning Commission review. The applicants <br />now propose a roof structure of f ® ® ^° 72^" ^^^^f existing is still reouired for the proposal. She added 172 s.r. or ex b <br />hLdcover along the northwest side of the house has been propose< <br />?or removal. The result is a total <br />12% in the 75-250’ setback area to approximately 52>t,. Lot coverag <br />is proposed at approximately 21%. <br />Mr. Pyle felt that the garage located closer to the house would add <br />to the aesthetic value of surrounding properties. He add-d th <br />J^dcover along the northwest side of the house has already Peen <br />removed. He requested that if the plan is approvea he ex 1st1ng <br />garage be allowed to remain until the new garage is built. <br />Chair Kelley stated that is typically allowed. <br />Mr Pvle noted there are two oaks trees that would need to be <br />removed and replaced, but added because ® <br />the property, they may have to look at other options. <br />Schroeder clarified the hardcover removed <br />hardcover. <br />Chair Kelley stated he has a problem with the excessive lot <br />coverage. <br />Hanson advised that the existing residence is a two bedroom home, <br />w??ra two car garage, and already exceeds the lot coverage <br />standards He indicated the roof structure was proposed to unify <br />two structures. He added the roofed area will serve as an <br />outside covered patio area. <br />Chair Kelley explained t.hat the lot coverage ordinance Is <br />rpiativelv new but it provides that lots do not get over-built on. <br />He added ^the ordinance is aimed at smaller lots, in order to <br />protect the visual impact of the property. <br />is non-StructuraI
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.