My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
10-25-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 11:06:10 AM
Creation date
1/23/2024 11:03:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 25, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1877 CONT. <br />Mr. Pulnam gave a brief description of the parcels and Mrs. Dickey talked about the historical <br />significance of the site <br />Kelley asked if the barn would come down and if not, is it structurally sound. <br />Jabbour asked if anyone from the Native American organizations have reviewed the plans and <br />approved them. <br />Mrs. Dickey replied that they had. <br />Kellev asked if the land would be deeded to the City of Orono. <br />Mrs. Dickey replied that it would. <br />Mr Putnam talked about the various ideas regarding roads platted in the developments. There <br />was discussion by all members regarding these roads and the mature woods on the Coffin <br />property. <br />Jabbour stated that he would like more information and input from the Native American <br />community. <br />Sandra Smith. Planning Commission, eonimented that the Planning Commission suggested a <br />meeting with individuals representing the Native American community to review plans to be <br />sure that their input would be included. <br />Mr Putnam reviewed the wetland issues regarding each property. He hired a specialist to do <br />a wetland study on the Coffia'Dickey properties and presented a map indicating the wetlands <br />(using rules of other agencies) and setbacks per Orono ordinances. Flic results of the <br />wetlands and setbacks po.se a serious problem in the usefulness of the parcels. <br />Gaffron noted that the code required a 75' setback for septic purposes. He indicated <br />setbacks may not be appropriate, necessarv' or justified in relation to Type 1 wetlands. He <br />went on the discuss mitigation matters. <br />There was some diseussimi as to where mitigation should be done. <br />Hurr and Jabbour felt mitigation should be done on site. <br />problem is to primarily determine whether Type 1 s should be considered dr>^ buildablc, and <br />secondly mitigation issues. <br />Jabbour asked for the staff's position regarding Type 1 wetland setbacks. <br />from a Type 1 wetland. Gaffron felt that mitigation should be done up front to protect future <br />residents hus inyi to deul with the issue indi\iduall\. <br />L_
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.