My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
10-25-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2024 11:06:10 AM
Creation date
1/23/2024 11:03:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Subp. 7c» Intensive Vegetation Clearinci: This definition isneeded to replace and modify the repealed definition of "Clearcutting”. The definition is reasonable since the complete removal of shoreland trees and shrubs in the manner described has a high potential for creating significant non~ point source pollution problems, which can reduce the long term economic value of shorelands. Examples of these <br />problems are damage to shoreland fish and wildlife habitat <br />via a reduction of the nutrient recycling, stormwater runoff <br />filtering and soil protecting properties of vegetation. <br />Vegetation also acts to visually screen shoreland <br />development which maintains the natural values of <br />shorelands. <br />Subp. 4 rsee Repealerl Clearcuttinq;_ This definition is <br />being repealed because a new definition, "Intensive <br />Vegetation Clearing" is being substituted for <br />"Clearcutting". The repeal of this definition is reasonable <br />because the word 'clearcutting' is a term used to describe a <br />technical forest management practice. Private and County <br />forest resource managers had indicated a need for the <br />shoreland regulations to contain a different word and <br />definition to describe and regulate the removal of shoreland <br />vegetation, especially in non-forest management areas, since <br />the regulations address a significant acreage of shoreland <br />that is not being used for industrial or commercial forest <br />management purposes. <br />Item A is necessary to exclude agriculture and forestry from <br />these provisions since the area is managed in subsequent <br />subparts. <br />In subitem 1, it is necessary to prohibit vegetation <br />clearing within the bluff and shore impact zones and on <br />steep slopes to protect the vegetation and soil resources of <br />these areas. The existence of vegetation in these areas is <br />important to reduce the erosive effects of falling <br />precipitation on the soil. Vegetation can also reduce the <br />velocities or disperse the flow of surface water runoff, <br />which is important since high velocity or concentrated <br />surface water runoff can readily erode soils. Vegetation in <br />these areas will also consume and utilize nutrients that may <br />be in runoff waters or in the soil profile which could <br />degrade the shoreland water quality if not consumed. <br />Additionally, vegetation root systems in these areas will <br />assist in binding the soil column to prevent or reduce the <br />likelihood of bank and slope failure, which further protects <br />the fish and wildlife habitat values associated with <br />shoreland areas. The existence of vegetation in these areas <br />also acts to screen shoreland development activities which
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.