Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />A. The property has an unusual shape; house has been placed to the east side <br />of lot where building envelope is most restricted. <br />B . The property consists of « of an acre and is subject to two acre zoning <br />Standards. <br />r If earage was moved further west to meet the 30’ side setback, Ae <br />sLcture would block the major view windows of the north side of the <br />residence and a major portion of the screened porch. <br />D. The property is not currently served by a garage. <br />p T.ere is not enough depth in the lot at the eastern portion of the property <br />m aUow a prSe'addiL to the rear and meet the required rear setback <br />for the zoning district. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />grating tjL\'S^wluWnr^^^^^ a7Cffic cd^itions. ligta. <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />5 m City Council has considered this application including the ;^ndh^^ <br />rccommei/Jatu'ns of the Planning Commission, reports b> y <br />by the applicant and die effect of the proposed variance on the hca y <br />welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the findings <br />Page 2 of 6