Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1850 October 7, 1993 Page 3 Members were also concerned that structural hardcover was being placed closer to the <br />lakeshore directing more and more drainage and debris direct to the lake. <br />The Planning Commission could not approve the amended application as proposed. They <br />made every attempt to obtain additional removals of hardcover but all attempts failed. They <br />asked the applicant ’s representative if he wished the application to be tabled to allow applicant <br />more time to consider additional removals but members were directed to act on the application <br />as presented. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous denial of the application <br />finding hardship representations unacceptable as they felt the applicant had not demonstrated <br />good faith in his consideration of hardcover reduction. <br />Options of Action <br />To accept :he recommendation of the Planning Commission and to deny the application <br />as proposed; or <br />Table application asking applicant to reduce hardcover within the 0-*’5 ’ and 75-250 ’ <br />setback area by removing existing improvements; or <br />To approve application as proposed. <br />Council Action <br />To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be drafted <br />for Council ’s review and action at your October 25, 1993 meeting.