My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-11-1993 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
10-11-1993 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2024 12:39:01 PM
Creation date
1/19/2024 12:34:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER II, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1854 CONT. <br />Mabusth explained that the code does not require alternate testing for developed properties seeking <br />improvements. <br />It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution #3337 for applicant Troy Anderson, <br />1490 Long Lake Boulevard, granting setback variances for construction of an attached garage. Ayes <br />5, Nays 0. <br />(*#6) #1855 PAUL E. BOWMAN, 3458 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3336 <br />Mr. Bowman was present. <br />It was moved by Goetten. seconded by Hurr to adopt Resolution #3336 for applicant Paul E. <br />Bowman. 3458 North Shore Drive, granting setback variances for construction of a second story above <br />the existing residence. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#7) # 1857 JAMES L. STINSON, 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES <br />Mr. and Mrs. Stinson were present. <br />Mabusth explained that applicant is proposing a principle structure addition to the lakeside of the <br />residence along with a deck reconstruction adjacent to that addition. She explained further that the <br />greatest concern is that this addition of the principle structure extending into the average lakeshore <br />setback could allow neighboring structures to e.xpand lakeward without need of variances. Structure <br />does meet the 75 ’ setback however. <br />Hurr asked why there is no date or signature on the survey provided and questions whether Council <br />should use and depend on this survey. <br />Mr. Stinson stated that this was the survey the building inspector provided to him. <br />Kelley stated he would like to know from the applicant in writing what the hardship is. <br />Hurr stated she would like to know if there were any stipulations added at the time the deck was <br />installed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Callahan, to ‘ end application back to the Planning Commission <br />and have the applicants present the revised proposal and updated survey and state their hardships. <br />Aves 5. Navs 0. <br />m 9 <br />(#8) #1859 JEFFREY D. MUELLER, 222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3338 <br />Mr. Mueller was present. <br />Mabusth explained that applicant seeks a variance to side setback for a detached oarage addition, and a <br />variance allowing the accessory* structure to be placed in front of the front line of the existing <br />rcsiner.ee.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.