Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1873 <br />September 16, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />4. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) - Review of lot coverage <br />Total lot area = 20,700 s.f. <br />Allowed = 3,105 s.f. or 15% <br />Existing = 2,419 s.f. or 11.6% <br />Proposed = 2,557 s.f. or 12.3% <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F - <br />G - <br />H - <br />I - <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Neighbor’s Acknowledgement Form <br />Floor Plan <br />Elevations <br />Survey <br />Hardcover Fact Sheets <br />Plan of Hardcover Improvements and Removals <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant proposes additions to the multi-use structure within the street yard of the <br />lakeshore property requiring street setback variances. The garage addition will be located <br />approximately 2’ from the street lot line and the storage addition 17’ Proposed improvements <br />result in 138 s.f. of new stnicmral hardcover with the concurrent removal of 222 s.f. of non- <br />structural hardcover within the 0-75’ setback area and 636 s.f. of non-strucmral hardcover in <br />the 75-250’ setback area. Total hardcover removal is proposed at 858 s.f. consisting of flat <br />stone patio and brick patio area, asphalt driveway, parking area to east side of garage and <br />concrete sidewalk. The applicant advises it was impossible to remove the flat stone walkways <br />along the west side of the lesidence as they help to stabilize the groundcover where surface <br />drainage runs between house ’’tid lot line to lake from the City culvert that outlet*: at the <br />northwest corner of the property. Drainage from road and surrounding watershed drains .lectly <br />onto this property. The existing 18’ x 9’ garage stall is inadequate to house a larger size <br />vehicle. The addition would allow applicant to store his car within the garage. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Please review Exhibit A. Af^licant notes setback of existing garage and sharp drop in <br />elevations to rear of 18’ wide garage. Both additions meet the required 10’ side yard. The Cir^ <br />has received no negative comments from the adjacent neighbors who were advised of the <br />improvements. <br />j