10-11-1993 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CATIONSlUSA application was incomplete becausemmiagement requirements that t r C^lahan Hurr) discussion with in....SIX months or maybe a year. Mike an acceptable timeframe, it could 0 proceed with his connection and the Id also like to proceed. ^nous difnculties with the stormwater btan Councils own draft of what they want the road. However, with the new City would be involved in the problems to bring to budget meeting a resolution tonight so that we can formally adopt r. to approved the Alan Nettles Sewer yes: 4, Nays 0. as connection over time rather than in a ned that it would be easy to do - simply howe^ er, that this would set a precedent p requesting the same arrangement. debt jcrv ice. v235 and increased ovct the years by Lials who opted to have the fee added original homeowners are paying would payment to be. in August 1986, he would pay finance the remainder to the same term Hurr asked what precedent this wmild set for the other two properties. Would they have to be financed for seven years al.so?Moorse stated it would be possible and is considering whether this situation is unique enough to set it apart.Goetten feels there is a difference between established properties and new properties. Kelley agreed that the distinction is \ery important and that requiring the full payment could impose a hardship on the owner of an existing property whereas the fee could be included in the fininoing of a new property. Mayor Callahan stated that he is opposed to the request. Hurr stated her concern about the precedent. Mayor Callahan stated that a decision \vt»uld have to be postponed until the full Courxil is present since the issue is split evenh'. Mr Nettles commented concerning the precedent, that there is a major difference between Ae amount of money an individual has to come up with versus the money a developer would ^ required to come up with and that it would be more difficult for an individual to obtain the funds. Mayor Callahan noted that there is not a purchase agreement signed by Mr. Melamed and Uiat if there is no purchase agreement by Friday, he would vote no on Monday because he felt it was not worth it to make the arrangement for just one property. (#20) ROAD MAINTENANCE POLICY Moorse explained the infom.ation included in the packet describes what there is to consider if the Council is going to move away from its current policy of leaving the pnvate roadways on their own in terms of maintenance. The information describes locations and conditions oi roads to be considered, along with an estimate of costs for maintenance. Hurr asked how many roads don ’t lune cul-de-sacs and what would it cost to build that right of way for each one. Gerhardson noted that the costs listal do not include the acquisition of those rights of way. Kelley asked how many of the roads wish to remain private. Gerhardson said he believes he’s had a call from every one of them indicating an interest in a policy or procedure regarding the C ily providing maintenance. Hurr commented on Millston being called a private road because of the school bus using it. Kelley explained that the buses do use the private roads to drop the children off at the door as a matter of safety. It was moved by Mayor Callalian. seconded by Hurr, to recommend acceptance of the information. Ayes: 4. Nays 0. * M