Laserfiche WebLink
• CABL.SUE M^OSON .,.i- «o•*«■ *•»•-•t*«k «•. •*••» n*.- ■’“- <br />SURVEY <br />ON, INC <00*^ ■Uti* •*® <br />'.r.OTr J <br />/ OAh^^'i * <br />C', <br />(?V- y <br />•• V * <br />/A. <br />N <br />V <br />A <br />5^*# <br />KSeptember 28, 1993Council Members:When we went before the planning commission on September 20 ) we <br />proposed to build a 12 x 18 addition and to replace our deck to be out as <br />far as the new addition. <br />The Planning Commission said that not only do we have too much <br />hardcover but we wanted to add 11/2 feet to the entire length of our house <br />which is an additional 59 sq. feet. The question was asked "Where could <br />we remove 59 sq. feet to compensate for the addition?” We didn't have an <br />answer. <br />The Planning Commission asked if we would remove the perforated material <br />under all our landscaping to help our hardcover area and I said I would if I <br />got the permit. <br />The Planning Commission questioned going beyond the average setbacks of <br />the neighbors which they thought might cause problems. Our permit was <br />denied . <br />After we left the meeting we decided that if we could add a 10 x 18 <br />addition on to our house and go no further out with our new deck, we <br />would be adding no more hardcover, and in fact we would have less <br />hardcover because we would remove the perforated material under the <br />landscaped areas. <br />I have letters attached stating from both neighbors they have no problems <br />with our proposed addition. Both of their lake v ows are straight forward. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jim Stinson