My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
11-17-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 10:06:35 AM
Creation date
1/18/2024 10:00:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />readily available backup network. In this situation, we believe It Is <br />appropriate to stike a balance between the federal Interest In protnotlno <br />amateur operations and the legitimate Interests of local governoients <br />In regulating local zoning matters. The cornerstone on which we will <br />predicate our decision Is that a reasonable accommodation may be made <br />between the two sides. ^ <br />23. Preemption Is primarily a function of the extent of the conflict <br />between federal and state and local regulation. Thus, In considering <br />whether our regulations or policies can tolerate a state regulation, we <br />may consider such factors as the severity of the conflict and the reasons <br />underlying the state's regulations. In this regard, we have previously <br />rec^nlzed the legitimate and Important state Interests reflected In local <br />zonli^ r^ulatIons. For example. In Earth Satellite Communications, Inc., <br />95 FCG 1223 (1983), we recognized that <br />. . . countervailing state Interests Inhere In <br />the present situation ... For example, we do <br />not wish to preclude a state or locality from <br />®><®^clslng Jurisdiction over certain elements of <br />an SMATV operation that properly may fall within <br />Its authority, such as zoning or public safety <br />and health, provided the regulation In question Is <br />not undertaken as a pretext for the actual purpose <br />of frustrating achievement of the preeminent <br />federal objective and so long as the non-federal <br />regulation Is applied In a nondIscrIminatory manner. <br />24. Similarly, we recognize here that there are certain general <br />state and local Interests which may. In their even-handed application, <br />legitimately affect amateur radio facilities. Nonetheless, there Is <br />also a strong federal Interest In promoting amateur communications. <br />Evidence of this Interest may be found In the comprehensive set of rules <br />that the Commission has adopted to regulate the amateur service.* Those <br />rules set forth procedures for the licensing of stations and operators, <br />frequency ellocetlons^ technics! stendsrds which emateur radio equipment <br />must meet and operating practices which amateur operators must follow. <br />^®®®9*^^^® "^1^® Amateur radio service as a voluntary, noncomaierc I a I <br />communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency <br />communications. Moreover, the amateur radio service provides a reservoir <br />of trained operators, technicians and electronic experts who con be called <br />w In times of national cr local emergencies. By Its nature, the Amateur <br />Radio Service also provides the opportunity for Individual operators <br />to further International goodwill. Upon weighing these Interests, we <br />47 CFR Part 97.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.