Laserfiche WebLink
V <br />. .*/ <br />: • r ■ <br />:ity 10) <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1364 <br />11) <br />12) <br />13) <br />14) <br />15) <br />16) <br />17) <br />18) <br />19) <br />20) <br />21) <br />traffic congested parking and <br />An inspection by Mike Gaffron on August 11, 1978 <br />ound the existing septic system to be substandard. <br />The maintenance and operation of a bait shop will <br />septic system^^^ demands on the existing substandard <br />The property can noc satisfy the area requirements <br />of the Orono Septic Code for both principal and <br />alternate septic sites. <br />The proposed use would not be a less non conforminy <br />use in the surrounding lakeshore residential zoning. <br />zoning district but in fact is considered an eypansion <br />conforming use and in compi#=^te violation of Ordinance 31.108. <br />The multiple uses proposed for the property are <br />considered a change to a more non conforming use and <br />in complete violation of Ordinance 31,101 and <br />Resolution 961. <br />The City has consistently denied variances for an <br />expansion of a non conforming use or a chance from <br />one non conforming use to another. <br />Ordinance 34.320 - permitted uses in the LR-lA <br />zoning district - does not permit a commercial bait Shop. <br />Use variances to allow uses not permitted by the <br />zoning code are forbidden by Minnesota law (462.357 Subd. 6(1)). <br />The multiple uses proposed would create additional <br />parking and septic demands on a severely limited <br />property thereby creating a potential threat to <br />the public health, safety and welfare. <br />The proposed expansion of the commercial uses will <br />have detrimental effects on the property values of <br />the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br />The proposal would be against the intent and objectives <br />or the Orono Zoning Code and the Comprehensive <br />Community Management Plan.