Laserfiche WebLink
id <br />the <br />nued <br />the <br />and <br />the <br />t to <br />Zoning File #1092 <br />November 11, 1986 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Sailor's World Inc. seeks to move their boat <br />sales and service business to the existing transmission repair shop staff <br />«San°- Sailor's World operation consists of or whft <br />would have in the new location. The applicant has not <br />submitted a sketch of the proposed operation nor have they described the <br />proposed multi use of the property. staff was just adviled by thi <br />applicants that they proposed only boat repair - winterizina of <br />Moposi^^ci' pedestrian vehicle use proposed on site. The current <br />Seceslarv if a vehicular access to the site would Se <br />■ af.j sales operation is to exist. If not, we have not been <br />advised of a comprehensive plan for the total proposed use of the <br />properties. Although staff has chosen to review application #1091 & 1092 <br />independently because of the separate ownerships and different uses <br />onlv°fot'acquisition of additional lands clearly suggests plans not <br />Ihll expansion of the marina, but of an overall change in operation <br />. have been included for this conceptual review. Mavbe the <br />contiguous parking lot proposed for 1950 Shoreline Drive will handle all <br />for sales and service operation. The applicant mav be <br />seeking the city's input before designing a'^comprehensive p^lanf ^ <br />on» non-conforming use section clearly states that <br />advised cTu^ncri’"f changed to another and yet Subdivision J <br />St1 1 ^ 4*; """reasonably require strict compliance to <br />with^rDroDertv®"thst^i.i t°°^ favorably on granting variances when dealing witn a property that contains a legal non-conforming use. <br />Issues for Planning Commission to Tkddress: <br />1. Per directive of Item 6 Resolution #961, is the boat sales and service <br />residint® ''°"~‘r°"^°f"'rLng'' (less Intense, more compatible with surrounding residential uses) than current approved use? ^ <br />P^J^J^ing needs per B-2 standard - 8 stalls are required at a <br />minimum - with boats on display can the property maintain it all - <br />intersection.® ® ®° ® «ith special sight concerns at <br />f*. ^"^fffic across City road - Planning Commission must be able to <br />etermine separate needs of sales and service use from commercial dock <br />use - discourage crossing over City road. <br />C. How would you counter the claim that this would be effectivelv <br />rezoning property to B-2 or granting a use variance? <br />Use unique history of property; <br />Use directive of Section 10.03, <br />Directive of Resolution #961.Subdivison 5 (J);