My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
10-02-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 10:05:25 AM
Creation date
1/18/2024 9:58:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />i <br />To;Mayor Butler <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />Orono Council Members <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Pr(Michael P. Gaffron, <br />Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date September 12, 1986 <br />Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road <br />Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - RR-lB <br />Application - Side setback variance to construct attached garage. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey, Site Plan <br />Survey Enlarged, With Details <br />Pertinent Facts: <br />The Building Inspector has given his opinion that this garage, to <br />be connected to the residence at a point by a concrete block <br />wall, is considered as an attached garage. <br />Side setback required: <br />Side setback proposed: 0-2' (Slab not surveyed, no dimension <br />indicating skewness of house on lot. Slab might be over the <br />line, for all we know.) <br />24'x24* Concrete slab, 9'6”x24' apron were poured without <br />permits, applicant asked inspector to come out to review burning <br />permit, construction without permit was noted and stopped at that <br />time. <br />Concrete block you see on the slab is not mortared and is being <br />stored until such time construction continues. . . <br />Discussion: <br />The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to construct <br />an attached 24'x 24' mansonry garage. He commenced construction <br />without permits, claims he wasn't aware he needed one. Then, when <br />staff discovered the slab, applicant researched and found his survey <br />showed the lot line extremely close to rear of slab.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.