Laserfiche WebLink
Date: <br />Planning Commission MembersMichael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />August 11, 1986 <br />Subject: #1060 J.F. Fleischhacker, 2775 Shadywood Road - <br />Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - LR**1B <br />Application - Variances for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, <br />structure in 0-75* setback zone. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey <br />Exhibit E - Proposed Deck Plans <br />Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations <br />Pertinent Facts: <br />Hardcover 0-75* existing +/- 10 s.f. or 0.1% <br />0-75* proposed 276 s.f. or 3.7% <br />75-250* existing 6,253 s.f. or 38.1% <br />75-250* proposed 6,268 s.f. or 38.1% <br />(with patio removal » 6,168 s.f. or 37.5%) <br />Encroachment into 75* setback zone =20* <br />Average lakeshore setback encroachment = approximately 10* <br />Discussion: <br />Applicants wish to construct a two-level deck in their lakeshore yard <br />in order to gain access from their upper floor level to the rear yard <br />without blocking any windows, hence their proposed design with a stairway <br />system mostly in the 0-75* setback zone. Please read applicant*s letter of <br />request. The structural encroachment into the 0-75* zone is about 20*, and <br />encroachment into the average setback zone is about 10* (based on the <br />curvature of the lake). Applleant*s letter indicates the deck is proposed <br />to have non-hardcover surfaces underneath, and recent Council decisions <br />indicate that 2nd-story decks with *5" board opening and permeable surfaces <br />below will not be considered as hardcover. <br />The portion of deck which extends into the average setback area is <br />proposed to be 31*' above grade with a lattice skirt, and will surround the <br />existing tree on the site. <br />Staff*s site inspection indicates that existing shrubbery somewhat <br />screens the proposed decks from the most affected neighbor, and no <br />substantial view encroachments will be sustained. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />The question here really comes down to how much of an encroachment <br />into the 75* setback zone is justifiable. The upper deck total area is <br />over 400 square feet. The lower deck/landing is over 100 s.f. Any <br />recommendation for approval or partial approval should make findings <br />justifying the magnitude of encroachment allowed, and should define <br />standards for the 2nd story decking if it is to be considered non-hard­ <br />cover, i.e. no future hardcover below or above deck, maximum 12:1 board <br />width/space width ratio, minimim spaces *5". <br />/T" I <br />•-7^ ./X /aJ <br />o O-yS 70 <br />;>Oytr <br />r(£;pl /O ! lyi'^ <br />1 > f f ' .V