Laserfiche WebLink
•Vf { » V ; V. '■t*. • J.- X .1m' <br />City of ORONO <br />& <br />OKf-.-rf’.-rj <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 1699_________ <br />A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF <br />MAPLE AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF SPRING PARK <br />SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE <br />CITY OP ORONO, MINNESOTA <br />♦ # * <br />WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation <br />organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and <br />WHEREAS, on May 20, 1984, Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug <br />Klint filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of <br />a portion of Maple Avenue originally dedicated in the plat of Spring <br />Park legally described as follows: <br />That part of Maple Avenue lying Westerly and Southwesterly of a <br />line drawn from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Ivy <br />■Estates, to the most Easterly corner of Lot 184, Taylor's <br />Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, and lying Northeasterly of a line <br />described as follows: Beginning at the Southerly corner of Tract <br />V, Registered Land Survey No. 461, files of Registrar of Titles, <br />County of Hennepin; thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly <br />extension of the Southewesterly line of said Tract V to the <br />centerline of said Maple Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said <br />centerline to its intersection with the Northwesterly extension <br />of the Southwesterly line of Lot 161, Winship's Subdivision of <br />Spring Park Lots; thence Southeasterly along said Northwesterly <br />extension to the most Westerly corner of said Lot 161, and there <br />ending. <br />WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public <br />hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on June 18, 1984, <br />regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an <br />opportunity to be heard; and <br />WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the <br />Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is <br />in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following <br />findings: <br />1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any <br />adjoining property. <br />2.The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve <br />or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for <br />utilities and access purposes hereinafter described. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />‘ 1