My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
01-16-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 1:20:44 PM
Creation date
1/17/2024 12:00:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />November 20, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />Kraemer said he does not see a public benefit to keeping it or a public benefit to vacating it. He <br />appreciates that the neighbors have taken care of it for many years. He said the Planning Commission is <br />advisory and he would like the City Council to weigh in. <br /> <br />Ressler agreed that the land has no benefit for a public use today. He asked if the public benefits from <br />land that cannot be used or from land that is privately maintained and taxed. He also pointed to possible <br />public expense to the City to maintain the land if it remains an easement. He said clearly there would <br />continue to be a need for drainage on that strip of land and possibly a drainage plan could be put in place <br />along with any vacation. He would like to have an engineer evaluate the easement for any drainage <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Curtis said the Commission could recommend maintaining the drainage easement along with a vacation. <br />She said if the vacation is approved it would be imperative to maintain the drainage easement. She <br />explained the DNR’s position is a recommendation. Staff would recommend maintaining the drainage <br />easement but any improvements to drainage would be a separate issue. She said the County makes the <br />determination on how the easement would be divided between the two neighboring properties if it is <br />vacated. <br /> <br />Kraemer moved, Erickson seconded, to approve LA23-000045, 1250 and 1260 Spruce Place to <br />vacate an unimproved right-of-way contingent upon maintaining a City drainage easement. VOTE: <br />Ayes: 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />2. LA23-000060 BRIAN BENSON, 3600 CASCO AVENUE, REQUESTS VARIANCES FOR <br />AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK AND HARDCOVER TO EXCEED 25 PERCENT <br />FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOME. <br /> <br />City Planner Nye gave a presentation on the item, stating the applicant is proposing to demolish the <br />existing home on the property and construct a new home in a similar location. The property is uniquely <br />shaped with an extreme average lakeshore setback that does not allow a reasonable building envelope. <br />The existing home on the property is entirely forward of the average lakeshore setback line. The property <br />also contains a wide easement. The applicant is requesting variances from average lakeshore setback and <br />to exceed the hardcover maximum of 25 percent in order to construct a new home. The applicant has <br />identified the property’s unique flag shape and position on a point as practical difficulties. The flag-shape <br />of the lot creates a very long driveway that comprises a large percentage of the overall hardcover on the <br />site. The driveway is 355 feet in length and over 15 percent of the overall hardcover. Staff agrees with the <br />applicant’s assessment. The property is a unique shape and does not have a reasonable building envelope <br />due to an extreme average lakeshore setback. Due to the placement of the neighboring homes, building in <br />front of the average lakeshore setback line would not impact their views of the lake. If the property had a <br />standard driveway length, the property would be in compliance with hardcover. Staff finds the variance <br />requests to be reasonable and in character with the neighborhood, as the current home on the site is in a <br />similar location, she said. Staff recommends approval as applied. <br /> <br />Brian Benson of Compass Real Easte of Wayzata, representing the developer, spoke as the applicant. He <br />said the situation was an illustration of the need for variances. The new house would be placed in about <br />the same location as the old house. The design of the new house is classic and minimizing massing to fit <br />in with the neighborhood. They are proposing a reduction in hardcover from 34 to 29 percent but would <br />still be over the 25 percent because of the driveway. He noted the neighbor also uses part of the driveway. <br /> <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).