My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
01-16-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2024 1:20:44 PM
Creation date
1/17/2024 12:00:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/18/23, 10:46 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve <br />https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=14073771&WorkOrder_ID=880…2/2 <br />current 1” of insulation. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />said land is located. <br />Response: The unique shoreline shape and placement of the neighboring homes does not apply to <br />all homes in the neighborhood. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. <br />Response: The applicant’s submitted information supports the request for average lakeshore setback <br />variance, and they have indicated it is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the <br />owners. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />Response: Granting of the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of <br />the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. <br />Response: The property has an existing deck that the addition would be built below, and new deck <br />stairs would be used to access grade. The new roof height is only to add to the current insulation and <br />bring it closer to code compliant. <br />130
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.