Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJ: <br />Mayor Butler <br />Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />Orono Council Members <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A, Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />July 15, 1986 <br />♦1026 M. Hilbilink/J. Vogt/Mrs. H. Peterman, <br />160 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary Subdivision <br />subdivision application #1026 back to the <br />• K ^ recommendation regarding the need to <br />establish future access and access easements within the subject property* ^ <br />List of Exhibits - <br />A - Hilbilinks letter of 7/11/86 <br />B - Staff's sketch of access corridor within plat <br />C - Staff sketch of future roads <br />D - Staff sketch of future roads <br />E - Blatz memo 5/12/86 <br />In light of Planning Commission discussion at your last meeting <br />regarding future access within the subject plat. Staff has <br />enclosed a memo from the City Attorney dated 5/12/86 that <br />a dresses nj^any of the concerns raised by specific members. Staff <br />review Section 11.01 - Policy and Purpose of <br />e Subdivision Regulations that may also give basis to staff's <br />Co^i\”*fion input or direction from the PlanningCommission on the issue of future access. <br />Council deems the access issue one of great import especially in <br />undeveloped lands that surround the <br />property. The Planning Commission is asked once again to <br />address future access in relation to this property. <br />Ihonfr> types of road acquisition or designation that <br />review. The first is the through road <br />wIZaV aesignating an access easement to the west border of <br />clear - a through road to <br />Crystal Bay Road). Staff would concur that the <br />o « the access corridor for Lot 2 at Old Crystal Bay Road <br />does not meet the safety or use level standards for a suitable <br />Staff would recommend against the acquisition or <br />designation of an access corridor along the northern border of the property. <br />The next consideration would be a north/south link to Watertown <br />ffvK • extension of Woodhaven Drive. Mr. Hilbilink <br />(exhibit A) in his letter of 7/11/86 cites preference for an <br />eastern access for his future homestead and a future lot. Glenn <br />reviewing the southern undeveloped portion of this 1/2 <br />section notes that an east corri«^or access would be at the most