Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1053 July 17, 1986 Page 2 of 5 <br />0~75' Hardcover Area = 7,208 s.f. <br />existing = 141 s.f. or *1.9% (i & k) <br />proposed existing = 855 s.f. or 11.8% <br />(constructed without permit)(E + 1/3 of H) <br />(D + 2/3 of H) <br />proposed « 608 s.f. or 8.4% (F+J + 2/3 of G+**i) <br />Total proposed variance = 1463 s.f. 20% <br />•Hardcover existed within the 0-75 setback area in the form <br />decking? ~ an<3 replaced with <br />••Please note new retaining wall construction provides less hardcover. Existing (I) = 46 s.f. H^-oviaes less <br />Proposed (J&I) = 45 s.f. <br />75-250* Hardcover Area = 12,777 s.f. <br />allowed « 3194 s.f. or 25% <br />existing «= 2821 s.f. or 22% (A+B+C) <br />Total proposed = 3583 s.f. or 28% <br />Proposed existing * 678 s.f. or 5.3% <br />(constructed without a permit) <br />Va???n?e : constructed <br />Review of Application - <br />and ertlriof ofTi"s ®V'® remodeling both the interior <br />permits foTthe work “"^°-^tunately, his contractor failed to obtain <br />improvements involve the removal of lakeside porches/decks and <br />The Pvifttin replacing them with various levels of spaced wooden decJcino <br />to insiftl retainrng wall (I) needs to be replaced and applicant wishes <br />o? the lake retaining wall (J) all located'^Sithxn T^feel <br />?la? Thf®an^??r%'K^^ extended from the two grade level door^s Tt thi <br />D?ovidino%i^ structural alterations at the upper stor? <br />two egresses to proposed deck area H & G. Deck H has been <br />area F, uppe^^ <f^ck%"and*^th?> D & E have been completed. Lowest deck <br />adjacent /o"stru?ttre ha"ve not t^L"^o"m “le°t:d?°''""""'"" """" <br />untetThtTpac'’e7w°otd%rd^^r^ ^ "^Iter fabricM?: LptlchC allowing rainfall to filter through. <br />will result in l#aees proposed laJceshore improvements <br />ntt pervious tt rtnoff hardcover because the original harLover was