Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />W. B. VAN NEST COMPANY <br />3295 CARMAN ROAD EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 PHONE 612-471-7881 <br />July 16, 1986 <br />City of Orono Planning Commission <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />• L'• 1 • . . •‘ n- <br />< r — <br />i^/ <br />\ <br />\i <br />JUL I 81966 <br />RE: #1053 Raymond J. Kosak <br />Variance and Conditional U-^e Permit <br />Dear Planning Commission Members: <br />1 would like to submit the following comments for your July 21, 1986 public hearing <br />pertaining to Raymond Kosak, 3265 Carman Road. <br />I have reviewed the plans for the wood deck and retaining walls being constructed <br />around the existing swimming pool by Mr. Kosak. I understand that the deck extends <br />into the 75-foot setback from Lake Minnetonka and therefore requires a lakeshore <br />setback as well as a sideyard setback variance. <br />I would like to point out that the deck is above the ground and is constructed such <br />that it will allow the drainage of water through the deck between the deck boards <br />draining to the ground underneath the deck. The project also included the removal <br />of a considerable section of concrete padio and porch area which will no longer be i <br />impervious surface and therefore the project will actually increase the amount of <br />absorption area in Mr. Kosak's yard for protection of Lake Minnetonka. <br />Mr. Kosak's lot is a pie-shaped lot as are most of the lots on Carman Road. It is <br />not uncommon for these pie-shaped lots to require sideyard variances at the building <br />line. In fact, our house as well as most of the houses on our street, have had <br />sideyard setbacks which were necessary in order to build on these lots. The hard­ <br />ship is due to the shape of the lot making it impossible to meet the performance <br />standards of the zoning code without a variance. <br />I was a member of the City Council at the time the city granted a variance to the <br />previous owner of Mr. Kosak's house to allow them to build the concrete pool and <br />deck, which required a sideyard setback at that time. From my review of Mr. Kosak's <br />deck, it is not increasing the sideyard variance which has already been granted for <br />the pool. <br />From my perspective, I feel that this Variance and Conditional Use Permit should bo <br />approved for the deck and necessary retaining walls as it will actually reduce the <br />amount of impervious yard which existed and generally improve the absorption ability <br />of Mr. Kosak's yard thus improving the quality of the storm water run-off discharging <br />to Lake Minnetonka. <br />C o m p ! 9 t e Materials Handling S y s t e m s <br />i <br />4 <br />. __