My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
07-21-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2024 12:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/17/2024 11:33:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />Zoning File #1053 <br />July 17, 1986 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Approval is subject to the following conditions: <br />1. Geothermal filter fabric covered with rock mulch must be <br />installed under deck areas D, E & H. <br />2. Erosion control must be employed at the time the lakeshore <br />retaining walls are installed. <br />♦Staff has not included upper deck H as hardcover since deck F was not <br />approved and a pervious surface exists below on grade. <br />Alternative B <br />1. Reconstruct deck E (see exhibit I slashed lines) providing minimum <br />of 10 feet of deck along east side of pool for safety concern reducing <br />hardcover from deck E to 385 s.f. <br />2. Alter proposed deck F along sl?ished line (10 feet reduction) <br />allowing now for increase in hardcover from deck F within protected <br />area of 338 s.f. <br />3. Allow upper deck areas G & H to be constructed as proposed with an <br />increase in hardcover within protected area for a total of 72 s.f. - <br />portion of G deck that extends beyond lower F deck within protected <br />area. <br />Total ha*'^cover within 75* protected area of 795 s.f. or 11%. Same <br />Conditic apply as in alternative A. <br />Staff would add the following supportive findings or hardships to the <br />applicant's planner's findings noted on pages 2 & 3 of this memo: <br />1. Location of 75 feet setback line in re3ation to rear cf house. <br />2. Visual impact of structure within 75' setback area is decreased <br />because property is located on a lagoon and not visible from main <br />lake. <br />Staff Addendum - <br />A hardcover variance increase within the 75-250' setback area of 3% must <br />also be granted (total proposed 3583 s.f. or 28%). <br />Please note a side setback variance has not been addressed by staff because <br />it is their opinion that a side setback variance is not required per <br />Section 10.03 Subd. 15(C): <br />C. Fences which do not exceed 3-1/2 feet in height, fences not over <br />six feet in height along the street lot line of lake frontage lots <br />which front on a major thoroughfare, if fill is required, the total <br />combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed 6 feet above <br />the height of the crown of the road, terraces, steps, uncovered <br />porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the <br />height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend <br />to a distace of not less than two feet from any lot line. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.