Laserfiche WebLink
w <br />' 1 <br />Zoning File #1040 June 12, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The applicant has claimed that the wall will be constructed <br />in the same manner as the first installation. Plans have not <br />been submitted to confirm this nor, as the City Enginner's report <br />confirms, has the plan submitted with application been certified <br />correctly by the licensed engineer. This must be corrected <br />before the City can issue a building permit for construction of sea wall. <br />The initial installation provided for earthern tone .'iluminum <br />wall sections (each section 9" wide). The wall extends <br />approximately 20" above the ordinary high water mark and would <br />stand 8* high (6 1/3 feet of the wall would be under Wc.ter and <br />lake bed). <br />As in the first review, the City will not approve any <br />along the edge of the sea wall that would involve hard­ <br />cover within the 0-75* setback area. <br />Staff recommends approval of the extension of the sea wall <br />but will not schedule the application for final approval by <br />Council until the applicant's engineer certifies in writing that <br />specifications for wall are the same as approved with initial <br />installation and that the plan meets standard design criteria and <br />not that "it appears to do so". <br />Resolution 1522 has been enclosed for your consideration and <br />may be used in drafting the necessary findings for grantino <br />approval of current application. <br />suggest that this would be an appropriate time <br />remind applicant that he is limited to mooring 4 boats (boats <br />in excess of 16 feet) at his residential dock(s).