Laserfiche WebLink
•m <br />To: <br />Pro <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Michael P. Gaffron, <br />Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:June 12, 1986 <br />Subject: #1034 R. Scott Prochnow, 3440 North Shore Drive <br />Variance - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District - LR^IC <br />Application - Average lakeshore setback variance to construct an <br />enclosed 3-season porch over portion of existing <br />deck. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Plat Map <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Survey <br />Exhibit E - Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit P - Construction Plans <br />Pertinent Pacts <br />Hardcover (no variance required) <br />Existing Proposed Allo' <br />0-75*0%0%0% <br />75-250'24.4%No change 25% <br />250-500'20.2%No change 30% <br />NOTE that entire driveway is included as hardcover, although it <br />serves 3 additional homes. <br />Average Setback (variance required) <br />Existing lakeshore setback is approximately 180* for <br />applicant and adjacent residences. <br />Encroachment into average setback = 12* <br />Discussion <br />Applicant wishes to enclose a 3-season porch to be located <br />over a portion of the existing deck on the front side of the <br />house. Residences on both sides of applicant are set back <br />approximately equal distance from lake, hence, enclosure of porch <br />causes a 12' encroachment into average setback. Existing trees, <br />and bushes, already obscure neighbor's lake views to the side, <br />and the extreme view angle to the side would limit these views <br />regar'^less. In staff's opinion, no substantial view encroachment <br />will occur as a result of the proposed porch. I talked with <br />neighbor to the east; he is in favor of approval, and he informs <br />me that neighbor to the west is moving.