Laserfiche WebLink
To:Planning Commission Members <br />From:Michael P. Gaffron, <br />Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: May 15r 1986 <br />Subject: #1025 Edward R. Henrich, 4115 Highwood Road - Variance <br />Zoning District - LR-IB, 1-acre <br />Application - Variances to lot area and lot width to declare lot <br />as buildable <br />0-75* Lot Area * 3,900 s.f. <br />75-250* Lot Area = 4,536 s.f. <br />Total Lot Area = 8,436 s.f. = 0.194 Acre <br />Required Area = 43,560 s.f. = 1.0 Acre <br />Variance * 35,124 s.f. = 80.6% Variance <br />Lot Width (Average) = 43.5* <br />Required Lot Width = 140* <br />Variance = 96.5* = 69% Variance <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey With Existing Improvements . <br />Plat Map With Neighboring Property Sizes <br />The applicants are requesting variances to construct a residence <br />on this commonly-owned substandard lot. The Henrich*s live at 4125 <br />Higjiwood Road,in their existing home on Lots 20 and 21 (combined). <br />They purchased Lot 19 (4115 Highwood) with a small cabin on it in <br />1953, but never combined it with their homestead. The cabin <br />eventually fell into disrepair, and was razed in 1975. Applicants <br />state that they have always planned to build on this lot. <br />This is a common ownership situation, and City policy since 1984 <br />allows us to accept applications for separation of commonly owned <br />lots, and review them on their own merits. However, we must also look <br />at the historical usage of the property and how a separation will <br />affect the adjacent commonly owned property, and how the property fits <br />into the neighborhood. In this case, the applicants own Lots 20 and <br />21 totaling 0.46 acres, and Lot 19 of 0.19 acres, for a total of 0.65 <br />acres commonly owned in this 1-acre zoning district. Separation would <br />take 1 substandard commonly owned property and create 2 even more <br />substandard lots from it, clearly not the intent of the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Additional facts which may help you <br />recommendation to the City Council include: <br />in formulating a <br />i