Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1032 <br />May 15, 1986 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The minority of 2 were against Fulmer's petition especially when <br />the planning study is not yet complete. They noted the following <br />concerns: <br />1. Dangerous precedent to begin after the long struggle the City <br />had to deter all local service to the interceptor line. <br />2. Planning study should be completed before we make such <br />decisions. <br />3. Applicants were advised in 1984 that the site was severely <br />limited for the proposed intensification in use - the conditional <br />use permit was granted because the Council was advised the site <br />could provide the additional septic area. <br />Ordinance 13 notes that the following findings must be made <br />before the Planning Commission can make a recommendation of approval; <br />1. Is the proposal contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive <br />Plan? <br />2. Is the proposal compatible with the zoning and official <br />control amendments being considered by the City in our planning <br />study? <br />4 <br />3. Will this proposal have an adverse impact on the health, <br />safety or welfare of the public? <br />• < -ra