Laserfiche WebLink
was <br />was <br />MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 18, 1986 <br />#999 EVAN MELINE continued <br />Mr. Belden stated that the County intends to sell some <br />portion of the adjacent property at a public sale in <br />March, at which time they plan to bid on the property. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the plat <br />map indicating the parcel of property Hennepin County <br />intends to sell. He further explained the variances <br />which would be necessary with the proposed plan whether <br />• the applicant acquires additional property or not. <br />McDonald questioned Mr. Belden on when the existing <br />hazardous foundation will be removed. <br />Mr. Belden stated that the foundation is presently <br />capped and will be removed as soon as possible, weather <br />permitting. He noted that the delay has been Mr. <br />Meline's absence and the weather. <br />McDonald stated that any new residence being built <br />should be built within the boundaries of the existing <br />foundation and would not be in favor of granting any <br />variances enfringing on the Fegers property. <br />Goetten stated that she would not approve <br />application as presented, but acquisition of <br />additional property may affect her decision. <br />Rovegno stated that it is a problem lot in that if <br />applicant was not allowed to build, it would become a <br />maintenance problem, however, if the additional property <br />were acquired, a modest dwelling could be built within <br />limitations. <br />Chairman Kelley stated he has a very hard time approving <br />this as being a buildable lot. <br /># <br />McDonald agreed with Chairman Kelley. <br />Taylor stated he would be willing to consider a proposal <br />for construction of a new house under one of two <br />conditions l)if the adjacent property cannot be <br />purchased, consider a structure no larger than the <br />one thats been there 2)if the adjacent property to the <br />west can be purchased, consider a proposal similar to <br />the one in concept presented at the December nceting. <br />Taylor noted that the current owners purchased the <br />property as if mid-January. <br />McDonald stated that someone should be fined for not <br />complying with the resolution ordering removal of the <br />foundation.