My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986 Planning Packets
>
04-21-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2024 11:15:18 AM
Creation date
1/17/2024 11:08:48 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #991/#1018/#1004 <br />April 14, 1986 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The plans approved with the building permit and current proposal show a <br />decrease in drainage towards the lake and a shift in approximately 1.24 <br />acres of drainage area to the ponding area to the south (see Exhibit L). <br />Per Exhibit M, the applicant's engineer in his summary (page 3) notes the <br />increase in runoff to the pond would raise the pond level 0.4 feet in a 100 <br />year storm and finds no appreciable effects on retention pond. Cook should <br />advise if a compensatory excavation to increase pond storage capacity is <br />required. <br />The M.C.W.D. does not require permit review for the proposed shift in <br />drainage. The applicant's consultant claims little effect on the pond and <br />local watershed. <br />The plans approved with the building permit provide for grassed slopes <br />ranging from 946' to 938' elevations within 51 feet along the southern yard <br />area (15% grade). Drainage from both the former Blohorn and Ulrich <br />properties would drain down to the 938 elevation and out directly to the <br />lake. The banks along the north side of the Blohorn property will be much <br />steeper than those proposed on the Ulrich side of what would have become a <br />ravine area. <br />I have asked Cook to comment on the current plans proposed by the <br />applicant. He contends the uniform or flatter grades and gentle grassed <br />slopes to lagoon provides a more suitable treatment area for surface <br />drainage. We both agree the original bowl area was ideal - providing <br />retention and flat grassed areas for surface water treatment but the house <br />now resides in the bowl area. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation - Alternative of Action <br />a) restore slopes to original contours. Ulrich side as proposed <br />on building plans - Blohorn side per elevations reconstructed by <br />engineer. <br />b) approve current proposal <br />c) create a grassed bowl area between both properties - eleva <br />tions to be determined by City Engineer. <br />Brief review of excavations - changes in elevations <br />Per Exhibit I, the applicant's representative claims they have no knowledge <br />of existing elevations prior to 11/84. Cook and I have attempted to recon <br />struct elevations as we remember them at the time of our two visits to the <br />site in October and November of 1983. Exhibits N & O attempt to show the <br />depth of excavations, changes in elevations and drainage shifts. <br />The original bowl area (majority of area now occupied by principal <br />structure) we determined to have been at approximately the 938 elevation. <br />The finished grade around the house is at the 946 elevation. The original <br />ground elevation of the previous residence is at the 946 elevation but the <br />garage elevation was at approximately 944 elevation. <br />The foundation required excavations of 5 feet at the southern end ranging <br />to 15 feet cuts to the north side. The majority of the fill and mounds of <br />earth found on the site remain from the removal of all native soil from the <br />foundation excavation in order to make room for the sand base under the <br />foundation block and footings. The basement floor elevation is at 933.3 - <br />code would require a 932.5 elevation (1 foot above the flood plain eleva <br />tion of Lake Minnetonka),
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.