My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1986 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1986
>
04-21-1986 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2024 11:15:18 AM
Creation date
1/17/2024 11:08:48 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGUIJVR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HEED JANUARY iA, ]9B5 PAGE S#878 KAUL (CONT.)Counci Imcmbor L. Adams stated that the B (. B concept is a good one. Adams felt that Planning Commission member Rovegno was right in his minority opinion at the Planning Commission meeting. Adams stated that he <br />felt that this B fi. B use fits right in with Section 10.20 <br />of the zoning code under accessory uses. Adams felt, <br />that the Hauls weren’t asking for anything that is <br />outside of the zoning ordinance. <br />Planning Commission member Rovegno noted that the Hauls <br />are willing to cooperate with the City and subject <br />themselves to City review every year. <br />City Attorney Radio stated that if the City was to view <br />this application as a license, such license vrould not <br />address the land use side of the application. Radio <br />stated that the City could approve this under a <br />Conditional Use Permit and review it from time to time <br />and incorporate provisions in a resolution to be <br />restrictive as the City wants. <br />Councilmember T. Adams stated that he was in favor of. <br />the application and that the conditional use permit is <br />the way the City should approve this application. <br />Pauline Bouchard of 186C Shoreline Drive noted that she <br />was very concerned if the Council was considering <br />placing no restrictions on the property. Bouchard <br />stated that the City needs control over the property. <br />Bouchard stated that the portion of lakeshore is very <br />desireable and that it will attract quite a few people. <br />Bouchard stated that it will look like a resort next <br />door. <br />Councilmember T. Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to <br />conceptually approve the bed and breakfast project and <br />direct staff to prepare the necessary provisions under <br />the code to handle this as a conditional use permit and <br />come back to Council in 30 days with standards and rules <br />that should be applied to the B & B use. Appeals <br />petition fee to be applied towards a different <br />application. Motion, Ayes (4), Kays (0). <br />Councilmember L. Adams asked that staff check into the <br />concept of letting the B & B concept fall under the <br />accessory use section of the zoning code rather than the <br />conditional use permit section.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.