Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of ORONO <br />'k: <br />/.N i <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO 3 2 3 ? <br />t * <br />(■ <br />9 <br />3.The OroDO Planning Commission icvicwed this application on May 17.1993, ^ <br />recommended approval of the variances as proposed based on the foUowmg <br />findings and hardships: <br />A. Lot narrows at the midpoint of the property measuring 55 at the <br />lakeshore and 35* to the rear. <br />B The applicant proposes a reduction of hardcover within the 0-75’ setback <br />area at 1.7%. <br />C.Emergency access can be achieved via 10+ toot corridor b^een adjacent <br />residences to the east and west. Prime access to site will be from the <br />south from the municipal hydrant. <br />Total structural coverage is proposed at 1,724 s.f. or 14.1% where 15% <br />would be allowed. <br />Proposed lakeside replacement deck will reduce the encroachment of the <br />average lakeshore setback line by 2'/4*. The existing deck is 15* in width. <br />The proposed deck will be 1014* in width. <br />F. <br />G. <br />I« X • t -4 1The home was ccmstnicted prior to existing zoning requi <br />No additional land is avaiUble to allow for expansion without the need of <br />variances. <br />The property has steep slopes to .outh creating unique drainage problems. <br />The City Council finds that the conditiens existing on this property w peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />naming the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions. Ught, air nor <br />nose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicam, but U necessary to aUevute a <br />demonsoable hardship or difficulty: b necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirU and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Co mprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 7