My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2024 11:09:54 AM
Creation date
1/16/2024 11:06:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 20. <br />1993 and recommended approval of the variances as amended based upon the <br />following findings and hardships: <br />A. Lot narrows at the mid-point of the property measuring 55 ’ at the <br />lakeshore and 35’ to the rear. <br />B. The applicant ppmoses a slight reduction of hardcover wiihiti the 75-250’ <br />.setback area at 3 s.f. or .01%. <br />C. <br />D. <br />Hmcrgency access can be achieved via 10’+ corridor bet.veen adjacent <br />residences to the east and west. The prime fire access to si^e will be from <br />the south from the municipal hydrant. <br />Total structural coverage is proposed at 1,649 s.f. or 13.5% where 15% <br />is allowed. <br />E. I'he proposed lakeside replacement deck and stair structure will reduce the <br />encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line by 3’. The e.xisting <br />deck is 15’ in width. The proposed deck will be 12’ in width. <br />E. Ihe home was constructed prior to existing zoning requirements. <br />G. No additional land is available to allow for expansion without the need of <br />variances. <br />II. <br />I. <br />Tlic property has steeper elevations to south creating unique drainage <br />problems. <br />Residential structure on lot to immediate east will be higher in elevations <br />than applicant’s proposed structure with third floor. <br />The City Couiwil finds tliat the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic condition.^, light, air nor <br />fK)se a fire hazard or other danger to neighb^iring property; would not merely <br />Rage 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.