My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1993
>
09-27-1993 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2024 11:09:54 AM
Creation date
1/16/2024 11:06:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
/ <br />To:Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmcmbcrs <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />s <br />% <br />September 24, 1993 <br />Subject:/»‘1856 Mark and Jenny Prueier, 3215 Crystal Bay Road - Amended Variance <br />Application • Resolution <br />Additional Exhibits <br />R - Schibilla Letter, 9/16/93 (Property Owner to West) <br />S - Amended Site Plan Approved witli the Planning Commission Recommendation <br />Brief Review of Application <br />In the amended application, applicant now proposes a total 15’ x 26’ expansion to the <br />rear and a 26’ x 34’ second floor addition. The actual footprint area has been reduced 78 s.f. <br />The front replacement deck and stairs is now proposed at 12’ x 17’. In the origirial June <br />variance application, deck was proposed at 13'/^’ x 18’. There has been a reduction in the <br />length of deck by 1'/^’. The average lakeshore setback encroachment has been reduced from <br />9'/i’ to 8’. Hardcover was approved at 29.4% in the original variance application. Based on <br />Planning Commission’s recommendation, hardcover would now be reduced to 29.3% (2,428 <br />s.f.). <br />The new issue for the current review is the need for a height variance as code specifically <br />stales structure may not exceed 30’ in height or 2*A' stories. The lower level is exposed more <br />than 50% and is considered a full stoiy. The struemre is technically three stories but measures <br />less than 30’ (review Exhibit .VI - lakeside/front elevation - structure measures 29’ 6"). <br />The applicant asks that the existing cement walkway in the lakeshore yard be allowed Ic <br />remain ft>r the ease of snow maintenaiKc rather than the installation of p;.ds nie Planning <br />Commissiv)!! recommended approval of the request as hardcover in the 75-2.VO’ setback area is <br />proposed at 29.3% If the cement walkway remains as is. hardcover in the 0-75 ’ area will mn <br />be reduced and remains at 607 s.f. or 18.9%. <br />Please review the enclosed staff menu) for the Planning Commission review that lists the <br />multiple variances needed for this review. Fhc following variance tacts were amended per tlw <br />fMannmg Commission recommendation:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.