Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />I'o:Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmernbers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />\ <br />S, <br />4a <br />s <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & .Zoning Administrator <br />% <br />% <br />September 16, 1993 <br />#1847 Michael and Dana Barrett/James and Molly Wheeler, 2912/2918 Casco <br />Point Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution <br />Additional Exliibit <br />H - Minutes of August 16, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting <br />Brief Review of Application <br />In 1983, the owners of the two parcels completed a lot line rearrangement without the <br />approval of the City of Orono. The properties are torrens and Certificates of Title were <br />amended reflecting the lot line changes. As City did not approve the subdivision, taxes have <br />never been adjusted nor has the official map of the County recorded the lot line change. Mark <br />Green t)f Standke, Green & Greenstein Ltd. has been hired by Universal Title Insurance <br />Company to complete the necessary steps so that lot line rearrangement is officially recognized <br />bv Citv. <br />Refer to Exhibit G. Parcel B consists of approximately 1400 s.f. and will be combined <br />with Tract I. Tract L currently at 15,000 s.f., will now total 16,489 s.f. upon the completion <br />of the lot line rearrangement. Tract J will contain 18,579 s.f. <br />The attorney representing the applicants was asked to consider at this time a 10’ setback <br />from the newly proposed lot line rather than the 8’ 4" setback agreed to by owners in 1983. <br />The applicant advised that as properties are torrens, the change in descriptions would require <br />additional title amendment. Tlie attorney also advised that the owner of Tract J w^as hesitant to <br />grant more area feeling that the proposed lot line reflects the current u.sage pattern tor the <br />prc'perties. 1 he attorney askeii the Planning Commission to consider the lot line rearrangement <br />as created in 1983. <br />Plea.'vc review the entdosed packet of information prepared for Planning Commission <br />review and minutes of that meeting (Exhibit II). <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />ITie Plamiing Commission recommended unanimous approval of the lot line <br />rearrangement as proposed and approved the substandard setback of 8’ 4" noting that the current <br />structure is located 2 ’ from the shared lot line. Approval was subject to the applicants legally <br />combining Parcel B with Parcel C or Tract I. ITie enclosed approval resolution has been drafted <br />per the Planning Recommendation. <br />Isv